2002 Lada 119 vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada 119. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada 119 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2002 Lada 119. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 119. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 240 kg more than 2002 Lada 119. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (188 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 119. (129 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 119.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada 119 | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | 119 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1290 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
