2002 Lada 119 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada 119. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada 119 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lada 119 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2002 Lada 119. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 119. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 590 kg more than 2002 Lada 119. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lada 119 (129 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2002 Lada 119 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada 119 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | 119 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
