2002 Lada 2123 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 2123. (133 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada 2123 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2123 | 280 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1688 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2410 mm |
