2002 Lada 2123 vs. 1973 Rover 2000
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 2123 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1973 Rover 2000.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover 2000 (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 2123. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada 2123 | 1973 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Lada | Rover |
Model | 2123 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1688 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2640 mm |