2002 Lada 2123 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 155 kg more than 2002 Lada 2123.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2002 Lada 2123 has manual transmission. 2002 Lada 2123 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada 2123 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Lada | Oldsmobile |
Model | 2123 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1688 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |