2002 Lada 2123 vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 2123 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 2123. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada 2123 | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 2123 | 626 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1688 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |