2002 Lada 2123 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada 2123. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada 2123 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 2123 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 2123. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada 2123 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | 2123 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1688 cc | 1999 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1294 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |
