2002 Lada Samara II vs. 1949 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada Samara II weights approximately 350 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada Samara II | 1949 Maserati A6GCS | |
Make | Lada | Maserati |
Model | Samara II | A6GCS |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |