2002 Lada Samara II vs. 1953 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Maserati A6G weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lada Samara II | 1953 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Lada | Maserati |
Model | Samara II | A6G |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2560 mm |