2002 Lada Samara II vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Lada Samara II 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Lada Mercury
Model Samara II Cougar
Year Released 2002 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 6392 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2830 mm