2002 Lada Samara II vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 1300 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada Samara II weights approximately 55 kg more than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lada Samara II (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 1300. (102 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Lada Samara II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada Samara II | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Lada | Triumph |
| Model | Samara II | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |
