2002 Lada Samara II vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 500 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada Samara II. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada Samara II | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Samara II | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
