2002 Lada Samara II vs. 1995 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2002 Lada Samara II is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Peugeot 106 (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 106 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada Samara II weights approximately 160 kg more than 1995 Peugeot 106.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Peugeot 106 (112 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada Samara II. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1995 Peugeot 106 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada Samara II | 1995 Peugeot 106 | |
| Make | Lada | Peugeot |
| Model | Samara II | 106 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2450 mm |
