2002 Lada Samara II vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (177 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada Samara II. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada Samara II | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | Samara II | 6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 177 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |
