2002 Lancia Lybra vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Lancia Lybra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Lybra (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 310 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lancia Lybra (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Lancia Lybra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Lybra | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Lybra | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2210 mm |