2002 Lancia Lybra vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2002 Lancia Lybra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Lybra. (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Lybra.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lancia Lybra. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lancia Lybra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lancia Lybra | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Lybra | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1581 cc | 2354 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 246 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2430 mm |
