2002 Lancia Lybra vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2002 Lancia Lybra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 1,929 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Lybra (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lancia Lybra. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lancia Lybra. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 2002 Lancia Lybra has manual transmission. 2002 Lancia Lybra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Lybra | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Lancia | Lancia |
Model | Lybra | Zeta |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |