2002 Lancia Lybra vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2002 Lancia Lybra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lancia Lybra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Lybra (102 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 324 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lancia Lybra (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Lancia Lybra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lancia Lybra | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Lybra | Midge |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1581 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
