2002 Lancia Lybra vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lancia Lybra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lancia Lybra would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Lybra. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Lybra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Lybra | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Lybra | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |