2002 Lancia Lybra vs. 2011 Ford Ka
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lancia Lybra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lancia Lybra would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Lancia Lybra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Lybra (148 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lancia Lybra (314 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Lancia Lybra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Lybra | 2011 Ford Ka | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Lybra | Ka |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |