2002 Lancia Phedra vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 Lancia Phedra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Phedra (126 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Phedra should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby.
Because 1954 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Phedra | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Lancia | Talbot |
Model | Phedra | Baby |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 2693 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3130 mm |