2002 Lancia Phedra vs. 1956 Packard Patrician
To start off, 2002 Lancia Phedra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Phedra. (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Phedra.
Because 1956 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Phedra | 1956 Packard Patrician | |
Make | Lancia | Packard |
Model | Phedra | Patrician |
Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2944 cc | 5767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3240 mm |