2002 Lancia Phedra vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lancia Phedra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lancia Phedra would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 154 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Phedra. (126 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Phedra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 79 kg more than 2002 Lancia Phedra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lancia Phedra. (308 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lancia Phedra. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2002 Lancia Phedra has manual transmission. 2002 Lancia Phedra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lancia Phedra | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Lancia | Lincoln |
Model | Phedra | LS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 308 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1729 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |