2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1949 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1949 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1949 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Land Rover | Riley |
| Model | Range Rover | RM A |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2870 mm |
