2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1949 Toyota SA
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Toyota SA would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1949 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1949 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1949 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1949 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | SA |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
