2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1950 Opel Kapitan
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Opel Kapitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Opel Kapitan would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Opel Kapitan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1950 Opel Kapitan has manual transmission. 1950 Opel Kapitan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1950 Opel Kapitan | |
| Make | Land Rover | Opel |
| Model | Range Rover | Kapitan |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
