2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1954 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 182 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1954 Studebaker Champion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Studebaker Champion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1954 Studebaker Champion | |
| Make | Land Rover | Studebaker |
| Model | Range Rover | Champion |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2970 mm |
