2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1973 Morgan 4

To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1973 Morgan 4. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1973 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1780 kg more than 1973 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Morgan 4. (135 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Morgan 4. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1973 Morgan 4 has manual transmission. 1973 Morgan 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: