2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1975 Sunbeam Chamois
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Sunbeam Chamois. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Sunbeam Chamois would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1975 Sunbeam Chamois. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1975 Sunbeam Chamois. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1725 kg more than 1975 Sunbeam Chamois. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Sunbeam Chamois. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Sunbeam Chamois.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1975 Sunbeam Chamois | |
| Make | Land Rover | Sunbeam |
| Model | Range Rover | Chamois |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 875 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 391 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2090 mm |
