2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover | Ranger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4690 mm |