2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1991 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1991 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover | Ranger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4690 mm |