2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 604 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Challenger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2730 mm |