2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1998 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1998 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Oldsmobile SS. (319 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Range Rover | SS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 439 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
