2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 830 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2790 mm |