2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 796 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
Model | Range Rover | Aurora |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2900 mm |