2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2001 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1270 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2001 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |