2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Skoda Fabia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (310 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Land Rover | Skoda |
Model | Range Rover | Fabia |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 391 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |