2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 173 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Proton |
| Model | Range Rover | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 109 HP |
| Torque | 439 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
