2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Land Rover | Proton |
Model | Range Rover | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 391 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |