2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (439 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Land Rover | Holden |
| Model | Range Rover | Calais |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 439 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
