2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. (296 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Land Rover | SsangYong |
Model | Range Rover | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 439 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2970 mm |