2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Kia Venga
To start off, 2012 Kia Venga is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2012 Kia Venga. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Venga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 730 kg more than 2012 Kia Venga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Kia Venga. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Venga. (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Venga. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2012 Kia Venga has manual transmission. 2012 Kia Venga will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Kia Venga | |
Make | Land Rover | Kia |
Model | Range Rover | Venga |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 391 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1710 kg |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 48 L |