2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2013 BMW 5 Series
To start off, 2013 BMW 5 Series is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 5 Series (439 HP) has 157 more horse power than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 5 Series should accelerate faster than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 390 kg more than 2013 BMW 5 Series.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW 5 Series (651 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (439 Nm). This means 2013 BMW 5 Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2013 BMW 5 Series | |
Make | Land Rover | BMW |
Model | Range Rover | 5 Series |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 439 HP |
Torque | 439 Nm | 651 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4905 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2094 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1464 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2968 mm |