2002 Lexus ES vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lexus ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lexus ES would be higher. At 3,314 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lexus ES weights approximately 911 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lexus ES (325 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75. 2002 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 2008 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2008 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lexus ES | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Lexus | Rover |
Model | ES | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3314 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 65 L |