2002 Lexus ES vs. 2013 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lexus ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lexus ES would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Lexus ES. (225 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Lexus ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lexus ES weights approximately 845 kg more than 2013 Ford Mustang.

Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lexus ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lexus ES. (325 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lexus ES. 2002 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Lexus ES 2013 Ford Mustang
Make Lexus Ford
Model ES Mustang
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3314 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 225 HP 301 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 380 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2436 kg 1591 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4778 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 2035 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1412 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]