2002 Lexus LX vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lexus LX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lexus LX would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Lexus LX. (232 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2002 Lexus LX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lexus LX weights approximately 496 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lexus LX (434 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (408 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Lexus LX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Lexus LX 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Lexus Jeep
Model LX Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2002 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4664 cc 4701 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 232 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 434 Nm 408 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2436 kg 1940 kg
Vehicle Length 4900 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2700 mm