2002 Lexus Minority Report vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lexus Minority Report. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lexus Minority Report would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2002 Lexus Minority Report. (277 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2002 Lexus Minority Report. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 70 kg more than 2002 Lexus Minority Report. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lexus Minority Report. (417 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lexus Minority Report.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lexus Minority Report | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Lexus | Cadillac |
Model | Minority Report | STS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 4600 cc |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 417 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1742 kg | 1812 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2957 mm |