2002 Lexus RX vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lexus RX would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lexus RX (198 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-V. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lexus RX weights approximately 264 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lexus RX (283 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-V. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Lexus RX | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Lexus | Honda |
Model | RX | CR-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 283 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1601 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |