2002 Lincoln Blackwood vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Blackwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Blackwood would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood weights approximately 720 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Because 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2002 Lincoln Blackwood has manual transmission. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lincoln Blackwood | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Lincoln | Cadillac |
| Model | Blackwood | BLS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 58 L |
