2002 Lincoln Continental vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lincoln Continental | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
| Model | Continental | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 571 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
